STRATEGY & SCENARIO ADVISORY

Strategy that
holds up under
pressure.

Most AI strategies are built for a single assumed future. We stress-test yours against multiple plausible scenarios, so your leadership team can defend their decisions, not just explain them.
Most AI strategies are built for a single assumed future. We stress-test yours against multiple plausible scenarios, so your leadership team can defend their
decisions, not just explain them.
Georgetown AI Scenarios  |  AIGP (IAPP)  |  25 Years Org Design

Where We Work

Before the decisions get locked in.

Before the decisions get locked in.

Meninge engages before implementation begins. Before the vendor is selected. Before the

business case gets presented to the board. That is where the decisions with the longest

consequences live.

Strategy consulting firms hand you a deck. Meninge installs a living scenario portfolio your leadership team continues to use. The scenarios get refined as conditions change. The work stays useful.

Strategy consulting firms hand you a deck. Meninge installs a living scenario portfolio your leadership team continues to use. The scenarios get refined as conditions change. The work stays

useful.

Project planning keeps you from building badly. Strategy keeps you from building blindly.

The Methodology

From prediction to preparedness.

From prediction to preparedness.

Scenarios are not forecasts. They do not tell you what will happen. They tell you what your organisation is prepared for, and where the gaps are. That shift, from prediction to preparedness, is what separates this work from roadmap-and-hope consulting.

Scenarios are not forecasts. They do not tell you what will happen. They tell you what your organisation is prepared for, and where the gaps are. That shift — from prediction to preparedness

— is what separates this work from roadmap-and-hope consulting.

Scenarios are not forecasts. They do not tell you what will happen. They tell you what your organisation is prepared for, and where the gaps are. That shift — from prediction to preparedness — is what separates this work from roadmap-and-hope consulting.

Every engagement uses a structured methodology grounded in Georgetown AI Scenarios training. We build 3 scenario types: Baseline (the plausible continuation), Wildcard (high-impact, low-probability), and Normative (the preferred future, worked backwardsfrom). Each scenario passes a 4-dimension evaluation: plausibility, probability, measurability, and divergence.

Every engagement uses a structured methodology grounded in Georgetown AI Scenarios training. The result is a set of tested strategic positions your leadership team can use, not a one-time

deliverable that gets filed away.

Every engagement uses a structured methodology grounded in Georgetown AI Scenarios training. The result is a set of tested strategic positions your leadership team can use, not a one-time deliverable that gets filed away.

The result is a set of tested strategic positions your leadership team can use, not a one-time deliverable that gets filed away.

Every engagement uses a structured methodology grounded in Georgetown AI Scenarios training. The result is a set of tested strategic positions your leadership team can use, not a one-time

deliverable that gets filed away.

Every engagement uses a structured methodology grounded in Georgetown AI Scenarios training. The result is a set of tested strategic positions your leadership team can use, not a one-time deliverable that gets filed away.

Engagements

Named, scoped, with a deliverable

your board can evaluate.

Named, scoped, with a deliverable

your board can evaluate.

Each service has a fixed scope, a fixed timeline, and a clear output. Work begins after a signed agreement and deposit.

Start Here

00

90-Min AI Pressure Test

90 minutes + 48-hour summary

From $4,0000 CAD

For: CEO, COO, Chief Strategy Officer, General Counsel — leadership teams of 3 to 8

Most leadership teams have never had to defend their AI direction out loud, in real time, to someone whose job is to find where it breaks. This session does that. Martin runs your team through 2 to 3 scenarios built for your industry and the AI decisions currently on your desk, then names the assumptions your direction depends on. No preparation required from your team. You receive a written summary within 48 hours telling you where the strategy holds, where it breaks, and whether what you have is a strategy gap, a governance gap, or both.

What you walk away with

2 to 3 scenarios built for your industry and your pending AI decisions

Assumptions map: what is pulling your AI direction, what is pushing it, what is holding it back

Blind Spot Summary, 2 to 4 pages, delivered within 48 hours

Named blind spots with the strategic and governance risk attached to each

Confidence rating from your team before and after the session

Recommended next step with specific options

00·S

90-Min AI Pressure Test, Solo

90 minutes + 48-hour summary

From $2,500 CAD

For: CEO, COO, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer. Sole AI decision-makers.

You own the AI decision and there is nobody in the room to disagree with you. That is the problem. The group format runs on cross-functional tension, so when the tension is not available the pressure has to come from somewhere else. Martin reads your questionnaire before the session and arrives with 3 specific observations about your direction, then applies 2 scenarios directly to your decision logic and challenges your answers as you give them. You receive the same written summary within 48 hours telling you where your direction holds, where it breaks, and whether what you have is a strategy gap, a governance gap, or both.

What you walk away with

2 scenarios built for your industry and the AI decision currently on your desk

3 pre-loaded observations about your direction, prepared before you arrive

Assumptions map: what is pulling your AI direction, what is pushing it, what is holding it back

Blind Spot Summary, 2 to 4 pages, delivered within 48 hours

Named blind spots with the strategic and governance risk attached to each

Confidence rating before and after the session

Recommended next step with specific options

Leading a team of 3 to 8? The group format runs 2 to 3 scenarios and uses cross-functional disagreement as the pressure source.

One Decision

01

Decision Wind-Tunnelling as a Service

1–2 weeks

For: CEO, CTO, VP Engineering — time-sensitive AI decisions

You have one AI decision on the table with a real number attached and a date it has to be made by. The analysis behind it assumes one version of the next 18 months. We take that decision, run it through 2 to 3 plausible futures, and identify the specific conditions under which it holds and the ones that break it. You get a written go/no-go with the assumptions named, in time to still change the decision.

What you walk away with

Rapid scenario analysis for one strategic decision

Wind-tunnel report: performance across 2–3 futures

Key assumption identification and vulnerability assessment

Go/no-go recommendation with conditions and contingencies

One-page executive summary for decision documentation

01

Decision Wind-Tunnelling as a Service

1–2 weeks

For: CEO, CTO, VP Engineering — time-sensitive AI decisions

You have one AI decision on the table with a real number attached and a date it has to be made by. The analysis behind it assumes one version of the next 18 months. We take that decision, run it through 2 to 3 plausible futures, and identify the specific conditions under which it holds and the ones that break it. You get a written go/no-go with the assumptions named, in time to still change the decision.

What you walk away with

Rapid scenario analysis for one strategic decision

Wind-tunnel report: performance across 2–3 futures

Key assumption identification and vulnerability assessment

Go/no-go recommendation with conditions and contingencies

One-page executive summary for decision documentation

One Session

02

AI Crisis Scenario Simulation

2–3 weeks prep + half-day

For: CEO, COO, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, CHRO

Most leadership teams have never rehearsed an AI failure. The first time they work out who calls the regulator, who talks to the customer, and who has the authority to shut the system off is while it is happening. We build 3 to 4 AI crisis scenarios specific to your industry and your tool inventory, run your team through them live, and document where the decisions stalled and why.

What you walk away with

3–4 tailored AI crisis scenarios

Facilitated half-day simulation exercise

Real-time decision tracking

After-action analysis with gap identification

Stakeholder communication plan template

Crisis response protocol recommendations

Escalation pathway and ownership matrix

02

AI Crisis Scenario Simulation

2–3 weeks prep + half-day

For: CEO, COO, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer, CHRO

Most leadership teams have never rehearsed an AI failure. The first time they work out who calls the regulator, who talks to the customer, and who has the authority to shut the system off is while it is happening. We build 3 to 4 AI crisis scenarios specific to your industry and your tool inventory, run your team through them live, and document where the decisions stalled and why.

What you walk away with

3–4 tailored AI crisis scenarios

Facilitated half-day simulation exercise

Real-time decision tracking

After-action analysis with gap identification

Stakeholder communication plan template

Crisis response protocol recommendations

Escalation pathway and ownership matrix

03

AI-Enhanced Scenario Workshop

1–2 week prep + half/full day

For: CEO, CTO, Chief Strategy Officer —leadership teams, strategic planning offsites

Your leadership team already disagrees about AI. The disagreement usually stays unspoken because there is no setting where it has to be resolved. A half-day or full-day session puts 2 to 3 developed scenarios in front of the team and makes them work through what each one does to the current roadmap. The entry point for teams new to scenario work.

What you walk away with

2–3 fully developed scenarios for your industry and competitive position

Scenario assessment matrix with plausibility and strategic relevance ratings

Live demonstration of the scenario generation methodology

Strategic implication mapping for your current AI roadmap

Board briefing package: visual scenario narratives and executive deck, available as an add-on

Visual scenario narratives for board or leadership communication

Post-workshop brief with recommended next steps

03

AI-Enhanced Scenario Workshop

1–2 week prep + half/full day

For: CEO, CTO, Chief Strategy Officer —leadership teams, strategic planning offsites

Your leadership team already disagrees about AI. The disagreement usually stays unspoken because there is no setting where it has to be resolved. A half-day or full-day session puts 2 to 3 developed scenarios in front of the team and makes them work through what each one does to the current roadmap. The entry point for teams new to scenario work.

What you walk away with

2–3 fully developed scenarios for your industry and competitive position

Scenario assessment matrix with plausibility and strategic relevance ratings

Live demonstration of the scenario generation methodology

Strategic implication mapping for your current AI roadmap

Board briefing package: visual scenario narratives and executive deck, available as an add-on

Visual scenario narratives for board or leadership communication

Post-workshop brief with recommended next steps

Full Engagement

04

AI Strategy Stress-Test & Scenario Portfolio Installation

4–6 weeks

For: CEO, COO, Chief Strategy Officer, Board AI Committee

Your AI strategy rests on assumptions about regulation, vendor behaviour, competitor moves, and what the technology costs 2 years out. Some of those assumptions are wrong. This engagement finds which ones your strategy cannot survive losing. We stress-test the roadmap against 3 structured scenarios, map how a failure at one decision point moves through the rest of the organisation, and install a scenario portfolio your team keeps using after the engagement ends.

What you walk away with

Scenario portfolio: Baseline, Wildcard, and Normative scenarios tailored to your industry

Strategic blind spot analysis with gap prioritisation

System-level risk map showing how decisions cascade across actors and functions

Governance gap summary feeding into Pillar Two (if relevant)

Board briefing package: visual scenario narratives and executive deck, available as an add-on

Board-ready executive briefing

Portfolio installation session with your leadership team

04

AI Strategy Stress-Test & Scenario Portfolio Installation

4–6 weeks

For: CEO, COO, Chief Strategy Officer, Board AI Committee

Your AI strategy rests on assumptions about regulation, vendor behaviour, competitor moves, and what the technology costs 2 years out. Some of those assumptions are wrong. This engagement finds which ones your strategy cannot survive losing. We stress-test the roadmap against 3 structured scenarios, map how a failure at one decision point moves through the rest of the organisation, and install a scenario portfolio your team keeps using after the engagement ends.

What you walk away with

Scenario portfolio: Baseline, Wildcard, and Normative scenarios tailored to your industry

Strategic blind spot analysis with gap prioritisation

System-level risk map showing how decisions cascade across actors and functions

Governance gap summary feeding into Pillar Two (if relevant)

Board briefing package: visual scenario narratives and executive deck, available as an add-on

Board-ready executive briefing

Portfolio installation session with your leadership team

05

AI Disruption Readiness Assessment

3–5 weeks

For: CEO, COO, CHRO, Board

Disruption in your industry will not announce itself as disruption. It shows up as a competitor pricing 40% below you, or a client asking why your process still takes 3 weeks. This assessment tests how exposed your competitive position, workforce plan, and business model are across a set of AI-driven disruption scenarios, and tells you which ones you could absorb and which would require a different company.

What you walk away with

Industry-specific disruption scenario set

Competitive exposure analysis across scenario futures

Workforce and business model vulnerability map

Prioritised readiness gap report

Board briefing package: visual scenario narratives and executive deck, available as an add-on

Strategic recommendations with scenario-tested options

Board-ready summary

05

AI Disruption Readiness Assessment

3–5 weeks

For: CEO, COO, CHRO, Board

Disruption in your industry will not announce itself as disruption. It shows up as a competitor pricing 40% below you, or a client asking why your process still takes 3 weeks. This assessment tests how exposed your competitive position, workforce plan, and business model are across a set of AI-driven disruption scenarios, and tells you which ones you could absorb and which would require a different company.

What you walk away with

Industry-specific disruption scenario set

Competitive exposure analysis across scenario futures

Workforce and business model vulnerability map

Prioritised readiness gap report

Board briefing package: visual scenario narratives and executive deck, available as an add-on

Strategic recommendations with scenario-tested options

Board-ready summary

06

Executive Decision Framework with Wind-Tunnelling

3–5 weeks

For: CEO, CTO, Chief Strategy Officer

AI decisions arrive faster than the process for evaluating them, so most get approved on the strength of whoever presented them best. This engagement builds the evaluation standard your organisation applies to every AI decision, wind-tunnels 2 to 3 of your current ones through it, and leaves the framework with your team so the next decision does not depend on who is in the room.

What you walk away with

Custom AI decision evaluation framework for your organisation

Wind-tunnel analysis of 2–3 current strategic decisions

RACI structure for AI decision ownership

Decision documentation templates

Leadership facilitation guide for ongoing use

06

Executive Decision Framework with Wind-Tunnelling

3–5 weeks

For: CEO, CTO, Chief Strategy Officer

AI decisions arrive faster than the process for evaluating them, so most get approved on the strength of whoever presented them best. This engagement builds the evaluation standard your organisation applies to every AI decision, wind-tunnels 2 to 3 of your current ones through it, and leaves the framework with your team so the next decision does not depend on who is in the room.

What you walk away with

Custom AI decision evaluation framework for your organisation

Wind-tunnel analysis of 2–3 current strategic decisions

RACI structure for AI decision ownership

Decision documentation templates

Leadership facilitation guide for ongoing use

07

AI Portfolio Risk Analysis

2–4 weeks

For: CTO, VP Engineering, Chief Risk Officer

With 5 or more AI tools in production, each one was assessed alone. The risk that matters sits between them: a model feeding another model, 3 tools depending on the same vendor, a failure at one point that nobody traced downstream. We inventory the full portfolio, score risk at the component and aggregate level, and identify the compounding failure modes.

What you walk away with

Complete AI portfolio inventory and dependency map

Portfolio risk map with individual and aggregate risk scores

Vendor concentration and dependency chain analysis

Scenario-based vulnerability assessment per component

Portfolio installation session with your leadership team

Compounding failure mode identification

07

AI Portfolio Risk Analysis

2–4 weeks

For: CTO, VP Engineering, Chief Risk Officer

With 5 or more AI tools in production, each one was assessed alone. The risk that matters sits between them: a model feeding another model, 3 tools depending on the same vendor, a failure at one point that nobody traced downstream. We inventory the full portfolio, score risk at the component and aggregate level, and identify the compounding failure modes.

What you walk away with

Complete AI portfolio inventory and dependency map

Portfolio risk map with individual and aggregate risk scores

Vendor concentration and dependency chain analysis

Scenario-based vulnerability assessment per component

Portfolio installation session with your leadership team

Compounding failure mode identification

Ongoing

08

Strategic Scenario Retainer

6-month minimum

Retainer

For: CEO, COO, Chief Strategy Officer — post-portfolio installation

A scenario portfolio built in March describes March. Regulation moves, vendors change terms, competitors do something nobody modelled. This retainer keeps the portfolio current: quarterly refresh against new evidence, monthly check-ins on what has shifted, and on-demand wind-tunnelling when a decision cannot wait for the next quarter.

What you walk away with

Quarterly scenario portfolio refresh with iterative refinement

Monthly executive check-in against the portfolio

On-demand wind-tunnelling for time-sensitive decisions (up to 2 per month)

Annual comprehensive portfolio review

Continuous governance gap flagging feeding into Pillar Two

08

Strategic Scenario Retainer

6-month minimum

Retainer

For: CEO, COO, Chief Strategy Officer — post-portfolio installation

A scenario portfolio built in March describes March. Regulation moves, vendors change terms, competitors do something nobody modelled. This retainer keeps the portfolio current: quarterly refresh against new evidence, monthly check-ins on what has shifted, and on-demand wind-tunnelling when a decision cannot wait for the next quarter.

What you walk away with

Quarterly scenario portfolio refresh with iterative refinement

Monthly executive check-in against the portfolio

On-demand wind-tunnelling for time-sensitive decisions (up to 2 per month)

Annual comprehensive portfolio review

Continuous governance gap flagging feeding into Pillar Two

Strategy and Governance Together

Strategy tells you what to build. Governance tells you who answers for it.

Strategy tells you what to build. Governance tells you who answers for it.

Every scenario engagement surfaces governance questions. When you stress-test an AI investment against 3 futures, you find out which oversight structures hold in only one of them. When you wind-tunnel a deployment decision, the question of who owns the output arrives before the tool does.

The Pressure Test is a half-day diagnostic session. Martin walks your leadership team through 2–3 industry-relevant scenarios to surface strategic blind spots.

No preparation required. You receive a written diagnostic summary within 48 hours.

A scenario portfolio tells you what your organisation should be prepared for. Governance decides who is accountable when the moment arrives. Meninge’s two-pillar structure means the same person carries both, and findings from one become inputs to the other.

It shows you where your AI strategy breaks under pressure, whether you have a strategy gap, a governance gap, or both, and which engagement makes sense next. Most clients move from the Pressure Test to a full strategy engagement. Some move to governance. The diagnostic tells you which.

Credentials

Every service traces to a specific credential.

Every service traces to a specific credential.

Not claimed experience. Verified training. Each pillar of Meninge's work

is anchored in a formal qualification.

Not claimed experience. Verified training. Each pillar of Meninge's work is anchored in a formal qualification.

01 — STRATEGY

Georgetown AI Scenarios

Georgetown University · April 2026

Scenario design, stress-testing, and strategic preparedness methodology. The foundational credential for Meninge's scenario advisory practice. Scenario typology, structured prompt methodology, and 4-dimension evaluation across plausibility, probability, measurability, and divergence.

02 — GOVERNANCE

AIGP (IAPP)

IAPP · AI Governance Professional

AI Governance Professional certification covering NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, and cross-jurisdictional regulatory frameworks.

03 — ORGANISATIONAL

25 years of Human Resources and Organizational Design

Canada · United States · Europe · Asia

Human Resources and Technical and executive recruitment across organisations in Canada, the United States, Europe, and Asia building the organisational intuition behind every engagement.

How We Engage

Fixed scope. Senior-led. Upstream

only.

Fixed scope. Senior-led. Upstream

only.

Senior-Led

Martin is on every call, in every session, writing every

deliverable. No junior handoff. The person with the

credentials does the work.

Fixed Scope

Every engagement has a named scope, a timeline, and a

deliverable. Work does not expand without a signed scope

change. You know what you are buying before you sign.

Upstream Only

Meninge does not do implementation, change management,

software selection, or training rollouts. Those belong to

capable partners. Our role ends where execution begins, and

that is deliberate.

How to Start

Discovery Call (30 minutes) to confirm fit. Then either a 90-

Min Pressure Test or a direct engagement, depending on

where you are. Signed MSA and deposit before any work

begins.

Most firms give you a report. Meninge gives you a position you can defend.

30 minutes, on the record, no obligation. We'll tell you whether we're the right fit before you spend a dollar.

AI strategy and governance for mid-market organisations.
Ottawa, serving Canada and the United States.

Fineprint

© 2026 Meninge. All rights reserved

AI strategy and governance for mid-market organisations.
Ottawa, serving Canada and the United States.

Fineprint

© 2026 Meninge. All rights reserved